Take this all with a grain of salt, do your research and form your own opinion. http://www.beyondveg.com/tu-j-l/raw-cook鈥?/a> "Introduction to the controversy The cooking = toxicity = disease paradigm. One of the most common ideas in raw-food circles is that most diseases are due to toxemia, and that one cannot be truly healthy without discontinuing what is believed to be one of the major sources of such internal toxemia: cooked food, even if such food is unprocessed in any other respect except by heat. While it certainly appears true that many people experience (sometimes impressive) improvements when first coming to raw food, it also appears that long-time pure raw-foodists who have maintained the diet for many years are rare. Anecdotal evidence also suggests (no peer-reviewed research is available on the issue, to our knowledge) that those eating 100% raw foods do not appear to be any healthier on average than people eating predominantly raw, and that raw diets are not the only diets that may work."|||Bro. N.S. Jack Ruby suggests the research be "taken with a grain of salt" if I understand the raw food diet, salt is banned so don't do that.|||Here is one academic article on this, there are of course many more: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content鈥?/a>

火车采集器